Home > Blogs > Post Content

The UK could become the first country to legalize the creation of genetically engineered babies (1261 hits)

The technique would involve defective DNA in the motherís egg being replaced with material from a healthy donor, in order to eliminate the risk of her passing a host of hereditary diseases on to her child. A child would effectively have two mothers and a father. Depending on your perspective, this is either an amazing benefit to society or a scary specter of an Orwellian world ruled by government scientists. However, according to The Telegraph, the therapy has the broad support of the British public. The procedure, known as mitochondrial replacement technique, is currently illegal, but that could change. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), a government watchdog, has set out safeguards for the controversial procedure that could affect future generations. It is now up to government ministers to decide whether they should ask the UK Parliament to consent to the therapy. You can get a sense of how it works by watching this video.

From The Telegraph:

By removing faulty DNA from the mitochondria, which is always inherited from the mother, experts believe the child and future generations could be spared from a collection of devastating conditions affecting the heart, muscles and brain. (Ö.)

The Department of Health, which ordered the consultation last year, must now decide whether to make Britain the first country in the world to permit the treatment, paving the way for its use in clinics. Mitochondria are rod-shaped power plants in cells that supply energy. They contain their own DNA which is only passed onto offspring by mothers. Defects in mitochondrial DNA (mDNA) give rise to a range of potentially life-threatening diseases, including a form of muscular dystrophy and conditions leading to the loss of hearing and vision, heart problems and bowel disorders. How many people does this affect? Around one in every 200 people in Britain is affected by faulty mitochondria; out of these, one in 6,500 people suffer from incurable diseases such as muscular dystrophy or ataxia.

The HFEA has advised certain restrictions: if the government does legalize the therapy, donors and patients should remain anonymous. The group also points out that further tests are needed to ensure the therapy is safe and effective, but believes that it could be ready within a year. uSo is this therapy the first step on a slippery slope to designer babies and eugenics, as some critics have argued?

Or is it an exciting new development that will lead to the eradication of a host of serious inherited diseases?

For many people, I suspect the answer will depend on their personal experience. Several years ago, I was assigned to work with a 14-year-old boy suffering from muscular dystrophy. He was a bright, creative child, but confined to a wheelchair and slowly losing all muscle control. He died two years later. His brother, five years younger, knew that he was destined to follow the same path. Their mother lived in a constant state of despair and guilt. MSo yes, if this technique brings hope to people who are carriers of conditions like muscular dystrophy, then letís make it as widely available as possible. Others will disagree with me, concerned that we are tinkering with nature too much, without knowing exactly what the consequences might be, or they will question whether we really want to create genetically modified humans. The reality is that we humans will always want to push boundaries, to explore, and to improve on what we have. Thatís a good thing, but the moral and ethical questions need to be resolved too

Read more: http://www.care2.com/causes/3-parent-babies-coming-soon-to-the-uk.html#ixzz2Ok7ldWLi

Posted By: Jen Fad
Wednesday, March 27th 2013 at 9:21AM
You can also click here to view all posts by this author...

Report obscenity | post comment
Share |
Please Login To Post Comments...

This is a bit eerie...Reminds me of The Matrix.

The reality is that we humans will always want to push boundaries, to explore, and to improve on what we have. Thatís a good thing, but the moral and ethical questions need to be resolved too.

We may be asking "Is this real?'

Wednesday, March 27th 2013 at 7:10PM
More From This Author
Christian NFL Player Shares Powerful Story That Changed the Way One Friend Saw the Confederate Flag
They Have Names: These Are The Victims Of The Charleston Church Massacre
Rachel Dolezal: ĎI Definitely Am Not Whiteí | NBC Nightly News
C N N's Fredricka Whitfield apologizes for calling Dallas gunman 'courageous and brave'
Lack Of Money & Access To Food Makes Cost Of Being Black & Diabetic High
4 Ways Rachel Dolezal Tried To Use Black Hair Styles To Fool The NAACP About Her Race
Sorry, Rachel Dolezal, There's No 'Trans' in Front of 'Racial'
Controversial New Diet Pill Hits Market-Results in Five Days?
Forward This Blog Entry!
Blogs Home
Sponsored Content Create an Ad
Follow Us!
Link To Us!
Do you have a website? Link to HBCU Connect!