**** or ****?
21 replies
·
5993 views
·
Started by i*heart*pie
·
Sep 2008
This 'issue' regarding Sarah ****'s last pregnancy has got me thinking. What does it mean to be ****? Or for that matter, ****?
I ask this because even though this Vice President hopeful is ****, during her last pregnancy she still chose to continue to have a speech even after her water broke. Even worse, she waited 11 hours on a plane afterwards to have her son. Putting herself and her baby at risk for infection. All in all, that seemed like a **** decision.
Even though it brought women's reproductive rights to the forefront, Gov. ****'s pregnancy and what she did during said pregnancy is entirely her business, and I agree with Sen. McCain...she should be left alone.
So, now that you know the story behind the thread, what's your stance...**** or ****? Oh, and why?
#1
Reply
****.
I don't believe we should make laws that try to change people's morals.
****. before **** was made legal in 1973 it is estimated that 800,00+ women per year tried illegal sometimes self induced abortions.
#3
Reply
pro choice...to add to what Orca said..the only reason **** was made legal was because a lot of women were dying... by doing abortions at home..sticking hangers up there and other stuff
Yes hangers, plus drinking bleach and other poisons hoping to self induce an ****. Along with throwing themselves down flights of stairs. This wasn't a small amount of women doing these things. It was thousands.
#5
Reply
Within the last 2 years I have done a 360 regarding my view on ****. At first I was ****: I felt the woman should have the primary decision in regards to her body and that it was a constitutional violation of the privacy right interpreted by the 14th amendment blah blah blah brainwash. However the reality check is that majority of the abortions performed are in situations in which the woman made the WRONG CHOICE. **** and **** accounts do not come close to the number of "oops" pregnancies. If women exercise the right choice-the choice of marriage before kids, followed by the choice of financial stability before conception, the choice of the mate etc then **** vs. **** would not be as powerful. I do acknowledge that situations of life-endangerment to the mother, ****, **** would be a strong arguments to keep **** available for these "special cases". And that the procedure would possibly still be abused by the ones that have pull within the system. But the Suspreme court case that held the decision of the woman's right to ****, Roe v. Wade, stemmed from an unmarried, pregnant female in texas that challenged **** rights. A pregnancy that was not a result of **** or ****. Nor was her life in jeopardy due to pregnancy. All from an apparent wrong choice she made.....
****. I believe that **** is like killing an innocent child, which isnt fair.
this is a deep topic
i believe that a woman should be able to choose what ever is best for her
but
I think that after the fetus has all of its organs...its murder
but when the mothers life is in danger or if the woman was **** then she should be able to decide what she wants to do.
i believe that a woman should be able to choose what ever is best for her
but
I think that after the fetus has all of its organs...its murder
but when the mothers life is in danger or if the woman was **** then she should be able to decide what she wants to do.konvinceme wrote:Within the last 2 years I have done a 360 regarding my view on ****. At first I was ****: I felt the woman should have the primary decision in regards to her body and that it was a constitutional violation of the privacy right interpreted by the 14th amendment blah blah blah brainwash. However the reality check is that majority of the abortions performed are in situations in which the woman made the WRONG CHOICE. **** and **** accounts do not come close to the number of "oops" pregnancies. If women exercise the right choice-the choice of marriage before kids, followed by the choice of financial stability before conception, the choice of the mate etc then **** vs. **** would not be as powerful. I do acknowledge that situations of life-endangerment to the mother, ****, **** would be a strong arguments to keep **** available for these "special cases". And that the procedure would possibly still be abused by the ones that have pull within the system. But the Suspreme court case that held the decision of the woman's right to ****, Roe v. Wade, stemmed from an unmarried, pregnant female in texas that challenged **** rights. A pregnancy that was not a result of **** or ****. Nor was her life in jeopardy due to pregnancy. All from an apparent wrong choice she made.....

