this is old, but i didnt see it posted, so for anyone who doesnt know, ronald isley recently had a stroke in london like right before rick james dies ...full story here
http://www.bet.com/articles/0,,c3gb10318-11383,00.html
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
Maybe because our generation can't identify with his music. I mean yeah he's been featured on many of the latest artist's tracks...but as a WHOLE we know crap about Ron Isley. If this was a 30+ board then this would be an 8 page+ forum.
^^ I sorta agree, but I think that a lot of people know who Ron Isley is, but they have NO idea about the extent of his musicality.. If they have never heard the old classics w/ the Original Isley Bros then they are not musically rounded individuals... I mean... "This Old Heart Of Mine" is a TIMELESS classic... hmm...
I know he will pull through. People know more about Ron Isley and the Isley Bros. than they think. He has been involved with a lot of modern artists, whether in the background or in the forefront.
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
very true
thats not neccessarily ture. I have memories of what I had for dinner last nite. Sometimes when you try to hard to read into things the outcome just dosnt make sense. We all know the saying about assumptions :wink:
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
very true
thats not neccessarily ture. I have memories of what I had for dinner last nite. Sometimes when you try to hard to read into things the outcome just dosnt make sense. We all know the saying about assumptions :wink:
ok well if you didnt want me to make assumptions about your statement it couldve meant "why dont we have 8 pages of text literally inside ron's memory"....but then again that wouldnt make sense just like your former statement didnt make a bit of sense ...because dedicating something "in one's memory" usually means they are ****, you dont see people dedicating dinners to someone "in their memory" when the person is alive and well because that would be a serious faux pas.....so simply put since the man is alive, it would be polite and respectful to not say "in his memory"
