Is it possible to BUILD a complete, in the sense of standard components offered, SuperHero with the features available to you for free?
Actually, it depends on what you consider complete...and according to my definition of complete...the answer to your question is "no"
My question was clearly stated, with the parameters clearly defined.
You usually seem to be an intelligent young man.
Is it your goal to appear obtuse?
If so, Mission Accomplished.
Is it possible to BUILD a complete, in the sense of standard components offered, SuperHero with the features available to you for free?
Actually, it depends on what you consider complete...and according to my definition of complete...the answer to your question is "no"
My question was clearly stated, with the parameters clearly defined.
You usually seem to be an intelligent young man.
Is it your goal to appear obtuse?
If so, Mission Accomplished.
Tell me how I appear to be obtuse...you asked me a question and I answered...
Quote:
Is it possible to BUILD a complete, in the sense of standard components offered, SuperHero with the features available to you for free?
In the sense of standard components offered and also according to my expectations and definition of "complete" the answer to your question is "NO"...There is nothing "obtuse" about my answer and the reason for it...
Tell me how I appear to be obtuse...you asked me a question and I answered...
laidbackfella wrote:
Is it possible to BUILD a complete, in the sense of standard components offered, SuperHero with the features available to you for free?
In the sense of standard components offered and also according to my expectations and definition of "complete" the answer to your question is "NO"...There is nothing "obtuse" about my answer and the reason for it...
The whole point is that I did not ask about your expectations nor your definitions.
I asked based on the components offered for free.
Your inclusion of other factors, based on your perception, would allow for you to logically provide a response of "NO".
Therefore a "NO" response relies solely upon the additional definition and refining of terms and variables added to the original question.
This also would lead someone to perceive that without any of those unrequested operational conditions added to the question your response to my query would by default be, "Yes, but....".
More simply put a "YES" response with an explanation to follow the yes.
Since in both of your previous responses it was prerequisite for you to enter in justification and only then answer with "NO" it seems as if your answer of "NO" is contingent based upon the explanation.
