this is old, but i didnt see it posted, so for anyone who doesnt know, ronald isley recently had a stroke in london like right before rick james dies ...full story here
http://www.bet.com/articles/0,,c3gb10318-11383,00.html
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
very true
thats not neccessarily ture. I have memories of what I had for dinner last nite. Sometimes when you try to hard to read into things the outcome just dosnt make sense. We all know the saying about assumptions :wink:
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
very true
thats not neccessarily ture. I have memories of what I had for dinner last nite. Sometimes when you try to hard to read into things the outcome just dosnt make sense. We all know the saying about assumptions :wink:
ok well if you didnt want me to make assumptions about your statement it couldve meant "why dont we have 8 pages of text literally inside ron's memory"....but then again that wouldnt make sense just like your former statement didnt make a bit of sense ...because dedicating something "in one's memory" usually means they are ****, you dont see people dedicating dinners to someone "in their memory" when the person is alive and well because that would be a serious faux pas.....so simply put since the man is alive, it would be polite and respectful to not say "in his memory"
Im glad to see that you can contradict yourself, however most ppl normally like to delete their first contradiction so they at least seem like they know what they are talkin about. Now you are talkin about dinner a lil "blah blah blah blah." Now that Im through anylizing your post there really isnt nothing there. You just typed a "paragraph" of nonsense so it looked like a rebutle.
As far as respect goes I dont think that laughin about Rick James' death and reminising skits is hardly respectful. In addition, music lives forever so lets not speak of death when it comes to that subject.
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
very true
thats not neccessarily ture. I have memories of what I had for dinner last nite. Sometimes when you try to hard to read into things the outcome just dosnt make sense. We all know the saying about assumptions :wink:
ok well if you didnt want me to make assumptions about your statement it couldve meant "why dont we have 8 pages of text literally inside ron's memory"....but then again that wouldnt make sense just like your former statement didnt make a bit of sense ...because dedicating something "in one's memory" usually means they are ****, you dont see people dedicating dinners to someone "in their memory" when the person is alive and well because that would be a serious faux pas.....so simply put since the man is alive, it would be polite and respectful to not say "in his memory"
Im glad to see that you can contradict yourself, however most ppl normally like to delete their first contradiction so they at least seem like they know what they are talkin about. Now you are talkin about dinner a lil "blah blah blah blah." Now that Im through anylizing your post there really isnt nothing there. You just typed a "paragraph" of nonsense so it looked like a rebutle.
As far as respect goes I dont think that laughin about Rick James' death and reminising skits is hardly respectful. In addition, music lives for
ever so lets not speak of death when it comes to that subject.
ok why didnt my thing sound right when yours is talking about "we have memory about food" :roll:...im just stating common etiquette about using the term "in their memory" ....anyways how do you know what is respectful, maybe rick james didnt want people sad and mournful about his death.....we can remember and still have a good time...because his life was all about "celebration"...i mean he even joked about his death on several occasions in the past so I mean you mourn your way, i mourn my way,.....LAST WORD :lol:
p.s--besides why should i be all sad and ish when he is in a much better place, he's most likely laughing at all of us for making such a big d
^^^ I know right...Ron Isley probably at home chillin...bout to produce some more stuff and yall crackies are still debating.
I think **** gonna win because Shoya said she was saying Good Bye for a while
I dont see 8 pages in Ron's memory!!! whassupwitdat?
umm cause he aint ****
exactly it shouldnt need to be that way!!! Ppl shouldnt wait til someone is **** to appreciate them.
you said "in his memory" which implies he is ****...hence that's why i said that....now if you wouldve said "why cant we have 8 pages to appreciate ron's life" then i wouldve agreed with you
very true
thats not neccessarily ture. I have memories of what I had for dinner last nite. Sometimes when you try to hard to read into things the outcome just dosnt make sense. We all know the saying about assumptions :wink:
ok well if you didnt want me to make assumptions about your statement it couldve meant "why dont we have 8 pages of text literally inside ron's memory"....but then again that wouldnt make sense just like your former statement didnt make a bit of sense ...because dedicating something "in one's memory" usually means they are ****, you dont see people dedicating dinners to someone "in their memory" when the person is alive and well because that would be a serious faux pas.....so simply put since the man is alive, it would be polite and respectful to not say "in his memory"
Im glad to see that you can contradict yourself, however most ppl normally like to delete their first contradiction so they at least seem like they know what they are talkin about. Now you are talkin about dinner a lil "blah blah blah blah." Now that Im through anylizing your post there really isnt nothing there. You just typed a "paragraph" of nonsense so it looked like a rebutle.
As far as respect goes I dont think that laughin about Rick James' death and reminising skits is hardly respectful. In addition, music lives for
ever so lets not speak of death when it comes to that subject.
ok why didnt my thing sound right when yours is talking about "we have memory about food" :roll:...im just stating common etiquette about using the term "in their memory" ....anyways how do you know what is respectful, maybe rick james didnt want people sad and mournful about his death.....we can remember and still have a good time...because his life was all about "celebration"...i mean he even joked about his death on several occasions in the past so I mean you mourn your way, i mourn my way,.....LAST WORD :lol:
p.s--besides why should i be all sad and ish when he is in a much better place, he's most likely laughing at all of us for making such a big d
first off u misquoted me!!! I never said "we have memory about food" :roll: Secondly you misquoted me again; used the term "in their memory" so why would you need to tell me ettiquete about the term? Lastly its ok not to be depressed about someone's death however finding selfish pleasure in it is wrong.
and to the p.s. noone asked you to be sad about his death? :arrow:
and thats the last word!!!!
^^^ I know right...Ron Isley probably at home chillin...bout to produce some more stuff and yall crackies are still debating.
I think **** gonna win because Shoya said she was saying Good Bye for a while
lol ya called me a crackie...but im through arguing cause obviously the man dont know what he talking about, its like arguing with a brick wall.....
i may have misquoted ya but i basically said the same thing you were saying if ya look back :roll: "i had memories of what i had for dinner last night".... and i used "in their memory" because "it could be in his/her memory"...to state a point if you ever wanted to talk about why dont "we have 8 pages in eartha kitt's memory" instead....oh my god you make my head hurt nevermind....just no getting through to you i swear
and AGAIN you are ASSUMING when you think i take selfish pleasure from a man's death....something is wrong with you....but THEN AGAIN we all know assuming makes an **** out of you and me, especially YOU...and THATS THE LAST WORD
basically you made an error and you hate to admit it, cause i dare you to write a paper in college, turn in it to ANY english professor and talk about "we did such sucha in their memory" when the character is still alive and the other characters KNOW the person is alive...COMEON NOW!...they would automatically point that ignorant mess out in a heartbeat if they were any good
