Nobody was thinking about ****attacks? Weeks in advance, the US government was recieving letters telling them that the WTC would be attacked. Shoot, after the attack in '93, I would definately be on my Ps and Qs about it.
Nah, I said no one was thinking about **** from the air. No one was thinking about people taking plans and ramming them into buildings. Folks were more so worried about car **** and truck **** (especially after the WTC in '93 or Oklahoma City)...
Nobody was thinking about ****attacks? Weeks in advance, the US government was recieving letters telling them that the WTC would be attacked. Shoot, after the attack in '93, I would definately be on my Ps and Qs about it.
Nah, I said no one was thinking about **** from the air. No one was thinking about people taking plans and ramming them into buildings. Folks were more so worried about car **** and truck **** (especially after the WTC in '93 or Oklahoma City)...
Question: Since when did the level of an anticipated attack determine the level of urgency from those who "protect" the homeland??
All I can say is we will never know for sure. So let these people keep on researching this and that. Becuase someone who has done research can knock down this theory with their own theory. I guess this is another reason to say "yeah, fukk Bush" type ish. Nothing can even be changed....*sigh*
You can look at it that way, or you can look at this thread as a medium for learning and expression of thought. I'm actually happy that this one thread has had so many responses, because of the topic we are discussing.
you...guys...are....killing me college students....do you hear? you're killing me...
i don't know whether to laugh, attack this crap, or to take a dump...i'll just sit here and sigh. :???: (michelle)
*sighs*
Actually, I'd like to hear ur take demmeri, or is that just a lame excuse to cop out cuz u don't have a response, even tho it goes against everything you believe in: Justice, Peace, and riding George Bush's nutz?
