CHiladelphia wrote: The Fat Girl Sweet Lee wrote: CHiladelphia wrote: The Fat Girl Sweet Lee wrote: CHiladelphia wrote: Yeah (im a dude) and i use it to some of my friends...anlways in a jokin manner like
I hate that store
U B*tch!!!THATS the best store
like that.
They usually dont have a problem wit u.
p.s. make sure you follow wit a laugh tho.
\
dont care...i dont wanna ever hear you prefer to your own sister as a B*tch...or any female for that matter....unless i say it's ok....lol....
but fareal...that is disrespectful...especially calling your YOUNGER sister a B*tch....thats not good...
Im liberal and i dont care about the meanings of certian words but anyway
i wont do it anymore if it offends some people.....BUT i insist that me and my sisters do it all in fun.
mmmhmmm ::smh::
I only use the B word when I'm referring to particular females who actually deserve to be called one. I don't use the word when I'm joking around with my friends and associates because it's disrespectful and silly. There's nothing cute about saying things like, "That's my b---h!", "Hey b---h!", etc. I HATE it when guys use it when they're talking about any female. :x :x To me, that is definitely disrespectful b/c it's degrading. We are not dogs. The same guys who use it wouldn't want their moms, sisters, grandmothers, aunts, and female cousins to be called one, so why say it? :???: That's what's wrong with most of us now! Anyway, I think the word should only be used in referring to female dogs and mean/pycho/vicious females.
MeganJerai wrote: A man calling ANY woman a B*tch says a lot about him and not who he is calling a B*tch.
some women um....like you need to be called a ****!
No woman ever NEEDS to be called the word ****. I can understand if you say that behavior is **** but most of us are in college and are supposed to be intelligent people. Lets figure of another way to express ourselves.
I get where you are coming from but you are wrong to say a woman is overstepping her boundaries. WTF is that? Women have been doing things on their own like rasing children and having careers WITHOUT having a man there to "assist" them. No intelligent, respectful man should ever have to refer to a woman as a ****.
Just_2_Much wrote: I get where you are coming from but you are wrong to say a woman is overstepping her boundaries. WTF is that? Women have been doing things on their own like rasing children and having careers WITHOUT having a man there to "assist" them. No intelligent, respectful man should ever have to refer to a woman as a B*tch.
I'm not referring to the single mothers and women doing their own thing. They're not b*****s. They're lonely. I'm referring to the women married to men that overstep the fact that God put men in the position as the head of family. True, God would not like to hear that a woman is disespected in such a way. But God would not want to see that women are not allowing their men to lead and thus falling in as follower and assistant to her husband. God would hate that women feel that they are doing all these things alone. Without man, they should then allow God that authority.
Branded J.S. Bison wrote: I don't call female ****, just Travis.
That B*tch
this **** is poking your mother.
