Bow down WOMAN.....

demmeri wrote:

yeah i agree with the stank that people manipulae this verse in order to take advantage of female folk... the Bible also says that you're suppose to love your wife as you love yourself...and that you're suppose to be what Christ is to the Church to your wife...i dunno if i expressed that properly... Chirst doesn't bop the church upset the head and call them a **** if they don't do right...Christ shows the example of how to be a good human and how to please God in your life and walk...Chirst is suppose to be the example of what God wants us to be...and this is what the male is suppose to do as head of his household...he is suppose to be what Chirst is to the church... but a husband is suppose to love his wife as himself (that's what the Book says)...it says nothing about slapping her upside the head and making her do the dishes...you're suppose to love her and treat her as if she's apart of your own body...it says nothing about you dominating her or about seeing if she can take a punch or not... and a woman is to respect her husband out of love...(the Bible never actually says "Woman, love your husband...")...a woman shows her love for her husband according to the Bible by repecting him and his leadership... ths husband was designed by God to lead...the question is what kind of leader is he? ladies, if you don't feel that you can trust or repect his leadership because of his incompetence, you shouldn't have married his **** in the first place... and there can't be 2 heads of the house...this is liberalism and feiminsm (sp) at it's worst...are there 2 Chirst in the church? when you have 2 heads, it's not gonna work....man was designed by god to lead, and he should be the leader or else it ain't gonna work, ya dig? 8-) (evy)

demmeri is responce to BigDaddy Tres wrote:

Ladies I'll have to apologize for Demmeri, he really doesnt know any better. don't get mad because i'm right...it's called wisdom...i listen to doctor laura and read the Bible...and what? Oh, and about the men and women being two heads of a household... youre so old school. Alot of the translations of the text do point to what you speak of: Men being the head. However, A head means nothing without a body (the church) so it would be safe to say that they are equally important. Equally. i never said anything about the role of women in the household being LESS important to the role of the male...I MADE SURE TO STRESS THAT THEY WERE EQUALLY IMPORTANT! and this is what women need to know and this is what they come to realise later on in life... this is what the feminist are trying to convince women...that thier traditional role is degrading...and men aren't helping either by taking advantage of thier leadership role...i guess this was the reason for feminism? i guess it was partially our fault befcause we took advantage by manipulating what our role meant... But hey, keep arguing your point about male superiority in the bible, im sure some woman will be drooling over you by the time youre done. :lol: dude, my future wife is gonna realise that she's with a man who follows tradition and what works....who believes in the relationship and is trying to follow examples that will make it last forever...i have and continue to seek wisdom on things like this... she's gonna be proud that her man was wise enough to seek out god's wisdom on what works....and to compare and contrast traditional realtionships and mariiages of the progressive culture...my babe is gonna be proud that i didn't model our relationship from the real world or some other liberal bullcrap show...my babe is gonna be proud that i will be her protector and provider and she's not gonna hev to worry about stuff like that....my babe is gonna be proud of me beause we're gonna be living like a family in the 50s....3 kids and a dog...i'm mr. "hi honey, i'm home" and she'll greet me with a kiss...we'll be happily married to death do us part in the hills of pradise valley, arizona... WHY? simply because traditional relationships work....this liberal "2-heads" stuff hasn't proven to be sucessful... you're just showing me immaturity when it comes to long term relationships and what works and what doesn't...i think you've been watching too much MTV and nikelodeon...maybe that's why you are confused about what the roles of males and females are in a long term relationship.... how long do you think your relationship is gonna last if you have your wife determining your finaincing plan and fixing that flat on your 2005 volvo s 80? do you really think it's gonna be forever if you're sitting there telling your son "now you wait tillyour mommmy gets home...you're gonna get such a beating...." while wearing that apron that you brought from O magazine? you'll be divorced in 5 years...just like all liberal progressive man-wit-coochie relationships... TRADITION WORKS!

PowerofWoman wrote:

i think he is threatened, but anyway... i did make this topic before, and i dont feel like getting to deep into this. i dont know about the whole submitting thing. i dont feel that anybody should have control over me but God. yes i read the scriptures, but society has changed since those days. now until someone can explain to me why i should do otherwise, this is where i stand.

Buttascotch wrote:

demmeri wrote:

explain why laura bush has a higher approval rating than hillary clinton qwhile she was first lady? ask a man to tell you what he thinks a strong woman is and he won't say a feminist....he won't descibe a feminist... he might descibe a lura bush type chick, or a preachers wife..somebody that is proud to be a female and has high self esteem... you feminist don't show that...you ju7st wanna bash males...

laura has a higher approval rate by whom? whose lookin at her little dippity lookin ****? whose pushin her to run for pres? who elected her to be governor?..............

MissJazzyAKA wrote:

The roles have been covered or have they :???: ?? It seems to me that people get roles confused with how the house hold is ran. Usually, the woman cooks, cleans and all that domestic stuff. Basically, a ****. and the man ? ...Fixes stuff, i suppose. Is that truely what God had in mind when it comes to roles? I don't think so. Personally, i feel that it's up to the particular couple to decide. whatever works best for them may not work for other couples. Many, marriages these days don't take on the traditional "roles" that have been placed upon them by MAN. With that being said, i believe in 100/100 not 50/50.

MissJazzyAKA wrote:

It's funny how demmeri, puts all his focus on feminist but never acknowledge why there was a need for the movement.