LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES CRITICIZE HOUSTON SCHOOL'S NCAA SETTLEMENT CHALLENGE
|
Posted By: Catalina Deossa on July 09, 2024 The proposed multibillion-dollar settlement aimed at transforming college sports into a professional model remains in a state of uncertainty following a challenge by Houston Christian University (HCU), which has yet to be fully finalized or filed. Attorneys representing players in the House, Carter, and Hubbard antitrust litigations urged Judge Claudia Wilken to dismiss HCU’s recent bid to intervene, labeling it "premature and meritless." The settlement, outlined in a seven-page opposition motion filed by Steve Berman and Jeffrey Kessler, seeks to overhaul college athletics by requiring Division I schools to contribute to a $2.7 billion fund. This fund aims to compensate players who were denied earnings from NIL rights, broadcasting revenues, and video game profits due to NCAA amateurism rules. Additionally, the settlement proposes a $21 million salary cap, akin to those found in professional sports leagues. HCU, the first and so far only Division I school to legally oppose the settlement, argues that it was excluded from negotiations and had no opportunity to influence its terms. The university contends that accepting the settlement could lead to financial ruin and force its officials to breach fiduciary duties owed to students and the wider community. While other Division I schools have not yet joined HCU in opposition, some leaders have expressed concerns about the rushed and opaque nature of the settlement negotiations. In response, Berman and Kessler, attorneys for the plaintiffs, have dismissed HCU's objections as speculative and unsubstantiated. They argue that HCU, as an NCAA member institution, is adequately represented by existing parties involved in the negotiations. Berman and Kessler also contend that the settlement's terms, particularly concerning future payments to athletes, are voluntary and subject to individual school decisions, akin to their voluntary participation in Division I athletics and NCAA membership. Furthermore, Berman and Kessler criticize HCU for its belated attempt to intervene, pointing out that the university has been aware of the litigation since its inception in 2020. They suggest that if HCU felt underrepresented or dissatisfied with the negotiation outcomes, it could have intervened much earlier in the legal process. The outcome of this legal standoff could significantly impact college athletics, depending on whether other schools or athletes join HCU's opposition to the settlement. Judge Claudia Wilken's decision on whether to approve or reject the settlement will likely be influenced by the level of opposition and the arguments presented by all parties involved. If you enjoyed this article, Join HBCU CONNECT today for similar content and opportunities via email! |
 |
Catalina Deossa
Archaeologist, CHRONOS SAS Florida Int`l Univ class of 2011 Member Since April 2024 |
Comments
More From This Author
Latest HBCU Sports
Popular HBCU Sports
