Air Force Removes Tuskegee Airmen Training Videos Following Trump’s DEI Order

In a controversial move, the U.S. Air Force has removed training courses that featured videos highlighting the heroic contributions of the Tuskegee Airmen and the Women Airforce Service Pilots (WASPs) during World War II. This decision comes as a direct response to President Donald Trump’s executive order rolling back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the military.

The Tuskegee Airmen, the first Black military aviators in U.S. history, broke racial barriers while serving their country with distinction. Similarly, the WASPs were the first female pilots to ferry warplanes, enabling male pilots to focus on combat missions. Both groups played a pivotal role in reshaping the military and paving the way for future generations.

Backlash and Political Response

The removal of these historic training materials has drawn sharp criticism from military advocates and lawmakers. Senator Katie Britt publicly denounced the decision, suggesting it was an extreme interpretation of the executive order.

Impact on Military Culture and Representation

This development has raised concerns among Black veterans, active-duty personnel, and military historians about how the rollback of DEI policies could impact the representation of marginalized communities in military training. The stories of the Tuskegee Airmen and the WASPs are not just historical footnotes—they are blueprints of resilience, excellence, and patriotism that continue to inspire young recruits today.

A Message from HBCUConnect CEO Will Moss

Will Moss, CEO of HBCUConnect.com, Hampton University graduate, and long-time supporter of HBCUs, expressed his disappointment in the decision, stating:

“The removal of these training materials sends the wrong message. The legacy of the Tuskegee Airmen and WASPs is one of perseverance, overcoming adversity, and making history. Their contributions should be highlighted, not erased. For young Black men and women considering military service, these stories serve as motivation to push past barriers and excel. We must continue to advocate for the full and accurate representation of Black excellence in all aspects of American history—especially in institutions like the military that should honor those who paved the way.”

As this issue continues to unfold, the question remains: Will the military reconsider its stance, or is this the start of a broader shift in how history is taught to future service members?

What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments!