For some reason, I just don't get with all this conspiracy theory stuff. Sure the government knew stuff, but I think it was there lack of coordination between agencies that screwed things up. It's like they had all the pieces of the puzzles, but no one knew how to put it together.
Here's my take on some of the points you made:
1. First, you say that **** didn't have a reason to attack the US.
Huh? Once again I say huh? They have so many reason to dislike us they're too numerous to list. First they don't like the US because of our policy on Israel. Next they don't like us because we try to impose our beliefs and system of government on everyone, and we do this sometimes by force and other times by crippling economic sanctions. And who cares if we gave them guns back in the day and trained them. We did the same thing with Saddam and Iraq back in the early 80s. We armed them and trained them to fight Iran. Past deeds don't always dictate future feelings. For instance, think about some of the countries we went to war with: Britian, Japan, Germany, Mexico, etc. Now most of them are our closest allies.
2. Next you say that it would be impossible for the terrorists to succeed without the governments help. First off, it's not hard to get into the US unnoticed. Think about it, where is the longest unprotected border in the world? Between US and Canada. Plus the US Mexico border isn't all that secure either. And it's not hard to stay in country illegally. It's really not. The only way INS will even bother you is if you do something stupid or someone snitches. It's not hard to get a pilots license either, if you have the money and the time.
3. Next you say the towers magically collasped. Umm, first they had holes punched in them some huge planes full of jet fuel. While the burning jet fuel by itself maybe wasn't hot enough to melt the steel beams, it's a fact that the strength of the steel drops markedly with prolonged exposure to fire. Add that with the plane taking out a good deal of support beams (or pillars). Also keep in mind, that a plane smashing through a building would pretty much **** any type of fire suppression system, so the fire would be burning out of control. So you have the massive damage from the plane collision, and ****; the intense heat; the lack of fire suppression, and the loss of some structural integrity. All it would take would be for one floor to collaspe. That's why the building imploded on itself. The force and momentum from the upper floors was coming straight down.
4. Ok, the Pentagon thing gets on my nerves. Look people, the Pentagon has five rings. The plane crashed into the outside one (ring E) and created a 75 foot hole. But the outside portion of the ring collasped 20 minutes after the impact. The 12 foot hole in ring C is where the plane stopped and coming apart as it came through the first two rings. The last hole is so small, because guess what the Pentagon is made of? Reinforced concrete. A plane is not going to break through all of that.
The only believable part about this conspiracy is that the flight over Pennsylvania was probably shot down. After the first three planes hit, nothing was getting anywhere close to DC.
But here's a very good article:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/defense/1227842.html?page=1&c=y
Check it out...
Aiight brother, I can understand that you might not want to believe what has been stated by the gentleman, WHO DID 6 MOTNHS OF RESEARCH on this particular subject, because it is frightening that the gov't would even think of doing this. But you have to admit some of this is mad fishy.
I coulda sworn that if somebody spat near the pentagon, everybody insode it would know about it, so how the hell could a plane fly into it without being detected?
Why were there no fighters on the wings of those off course planes?
I mean there are some things that I just can't explain that lead me to believe that this could easily be a conspiracy
