wow, also this... http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5993610/
for those of u who can appreciate a clear comparison and contrast between the stands of each candiate on various issues....
Although I sided with Kerry on most of his views...I hate to say it, Bush had some good views also. Some of Kerry views on Religion and aborotion disturbed me...but other than that..his plans for America are good...hope they arn't just PLANS...and I hope they turn into ACTION.
I am surprised to find out that John Kerry has voted in favor of permitting partial-birth ****.
For those unfamiliar with partial-birth ****, the procedure involves inducing delivery of a fully-developed or nearly developed baby, after which his or her head is punctured with forceps and the brain removed through suction. The fetus is conscious and un-anesthetized during this procedure. He or she is also capable of surviving out of the body, hence the term "partial birth".
For more information about partial-birth ****, click here.
This gives me something to think about... Holla!
I am surprised to find out that John Kerry has voted in favor of permitting partial-birth ****.
For those unfamiliar with partial-birth ****, the procedure involves inducing delivery of a fully-developed or nearly developed baby, after which his or her head is punctured with forceps and the brain removed through suction. The fetus is conscious and un-anesthetized during this procedure. He or she is also capable of surviving out of the body, hence the term "partial birth".
For more information about partial-birth ****, click here.
This gives me something to think about... Holla!
I agree........
this is HIGHLY Disturing........
Murderers.......
I am surprised to find out that John Kerry has voted in favor of permitting partial-birth ****.
For those unfamiliar with partial-birth ****, the procedure involves inducing delivery of a fully-developed or nearly developed baby, after which his or her head is punctured with forceps and the brain removed through suction. The fetus is conscious and un-anesthetized during this procedure. He or she is also capable of surviving out of the body, hence the term "partial birth".
For more information about partial-birth ****, click here.
This gives me something to think about... Holla!
I agree........
this is HIGHLY Disturing........
Murderers.......
bush did the same damn thing to innocent black men in texas
and also innocent civilians in iraq
and numerous homeless people on the streets
and about to be other people going to get **** due to the weapons ban being lifted
we already condone numerous murders in the United states without the blink of an eye, and once ya mention "baby" people wanna start worrying about murders, puh-lease :roll:
but then again im biased cause im pro-**** anyways, especially if the woman became pregnant from ****...holla :arrow:
I am surprised to find out that John Kerry has voted in favor of permitting partial-birth ****.
For those unfamiliar with partial-birth ****, the procedure involves inducing delivery of a fully-developed or nearly developed baby, after which his or her head is punctured with forceps and the brain removed through suction. The fetus is conscious and un-anesthetized during this procedure. He or she is also capable of surviving out of the body, hence the term "partial birth".
For more information about partial-birth ****, click here.
This gives me something to think about... Holla!
I agree........
this is HIGHLY Disturing........
Murderers.......
bush did the same damn thing to innocent black men in texas
and also innocent civilians in iraq
and numerous homeless people on the streets
and about to be other people going to get **** due to the weapons ban being lifted
we already condone numerous murders in the United states without the blink of an eye, and once ya mention "baby" people wanna start worrying about murders, puh-lease :roll:
but then again im biased cause im pro-**** anyways, especially if the woman became pregnant from ****...holla :arrow:
hmmmmmmm...well i agree w/ shoya 110% on everything be4 the "****" part...excellent points, gurl...excellent points...
but i don't know - partial births do seem to take the **** thing a little too far...
i saw this video last year in my personal health class...& walking out of that place, u couldn't help but go
we saw the process of **** (real-life examples )...& not even just the partial birth circumstances just got to me...seeing all of that was just...horrifying, man...
a lot of people who have seen that have said that either #1, prior to seeing it, they were for abortions or #2, they were somewhere in the middle...& in both cases, after they saw it, they now are completely against them...
i feel like...i don't think the president should necessarily ban abortions...i think it is the woman's right....that is something she will have to live with for the rest of her life and explain to God when the time comes...PLUS, the thought of women actually taking actions into their own hands to "get rid of their 'mistake'" makes my skin crawl...so i guess, if the legal way is what it takes than whatever is whatever....
but @ the same time...i wish people would be more accountable to their actions...i mean, situations of ****...can be an exception, but...even then, strong consideration must be undergone...
only other stronger circumstances i'd lean more towards a woman making that decision would be birth as result of **** or if the mother's life will seriously be put in jeopardy if she has the child...
but other than that....God forbid, but what if Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s mother had been ****....& she decided not to have her "Civil Rights leader" baby....where would we be today...?
shoot, what if forever reason, the mother of Jesus, Mary, decided to have an **** rather than give birth to our Savior...? REALLY where would we be?!?!
what if your mother (not singling you out or anything, Shoya - it's just a rhetorical question for anyone) had decided to have an **** 5 months...7 months...or however many amount of months before the day that became known as your birthday 19, 20, 21, or so years ago??
so that's how i feel....i wish females unless under the most SERIOUS of circumstances would so much as consider having an ****...but @ the same time, i feel the law should give them that right to make the decision in the first place....
and i guess to maybe restate my thing, i do love the kids and all, but with these two candiates my priority goes to helping the people who have been born who can/could fully comprehend their suffering at the hands of Bush....thats just the way i see it
*i know someone will say "well you would not have wanted your mother to abort you"....well my mom was considering it but she didnt, how i see it, i wouldnt have the capacity to know the concept if i was alive or not, not condoning random abortions, but if she wouldve made that decision then it's her body and i was just taking temporary residence in it, her choice her body*
but its funny because with my religion i believe in reincarnation, and with my religion, a death such as **** doesnt make any difference since you will come back again anyways in a different way...basically what im trying to say is different religious groups view abortions as either "the end all" or "a new beginnning....basically **** is predominantly a cultural and religious issue, that i dont think the government should be apart ofin the first place....did anyone understand that or did i lose a few people lol
oh yeah people who are voting based on the **** issue,really do need to research a bit more about bush's stand on ****, ya may be suprised...please people do your research to make a VALID decision!
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml%3Fi=20000703&s=corn
now why in the heck does bush call kerry indecisive again???...basically the man will say anything to get elected
additional note: though bush may say he may not want ****, has there really been any significant actions against it??
)...& not even just the partial birth circumstances just got to me...seeing all of that was just...horrifying, man...
a lot of people who have seen that have said that either #1, prior to seeing it, they were for abortions or #2, they were somewhere in the middle...& in both cases, after they saw it, they now are completely against them...
i feel like...i don't think the president should necessarily ban abortions...i think it is the woman's right....that is something she will have to live with for the rest of her life and explain to God when the time comes...PLUS, the thought of women actually taking actions into their own hands to "get rid of their 'mistake'" makes my skin crawl...so i guess, if the legal way is what it takes than whatever is whatever....
but @ the same time...i wish people would be more accountable to their actions...i mean, situations of ****...can be an exception, but...even then, strong consideration must be undergone...
only other stronger circumstances i'd lean more towards a woman making that decision would be birth as result of **** or if the mother's life will seriously be put in jeopardy if she has the child...
but other than that....God forbid, but what if Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s mother had been ****....& she decided not to have her "Civil Rights leader" baby....where would we be today...?
shoot, what if forever reason, the mother of Jesus, Mary, decided to have an **** rather than give birth to our Savior...? REALLY where would we be?!?!
what if your mother (not singling you out or anything, Shoya - it's just a rhetorical question for anyone) had decided to have an **** 5 months...7 months...or however many amount of months before the day that became known as your birthday 19, 20, 21, or so years ago??
so that's how i feel....i wish females unless under the most SERIOUS of circumstances would so much as consider having an ****...but @ the same time, i feel the law should give them that right to make the decision in the first place....
