Trending Search Settings

BACK AGAIN : YOUR MOST CONTROVERSIAL STATEMENT

293 replies · 119509 views · Started by IgnoranceIsBliss · Jan 2005

IgnoranceIsBliss

Bush actually was the better choice between him and Kerry

Page 28 of 30 First <19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 272829 30 >Last

Sister Tamara from Davenport, IA · Oct 2007

#271 Reply

ModelGurl817 wrote:
I completely agree. I will never vote for someone because they are black (or half black). I have to know where he stands on different issues. Plus, I'm leading more towards Hilary. Bill's her husband, so he'll will have an influence on her. He was the best president ofmy time, although I've only had two (Clinton and Bush)

PRAISE THE LORD!!! I liked Bill, he put our economy on track. He was doing better than anyone had done for a long time. He was backed by soooo many supports that the republicans were getting nervous. They kept their eyes on him until he messed up and went after him with all they had. Bill Clinton wont have an influence on Hilary. She has out-grown Bill. This is her time in the spot lite. Besides the fact that Hilary is a woman and I wont vote a woman into the white house, she's not all of that. She talks about the things that people want to hear, but you don't hear her advertising about how she's all for ****. About how she wants to amend the **** law to give females of all ages permission to have an **** without parental consent. Also, she's for partial abortions. I can't agree with that!!! I'm not for Obama because of his color, because I wouldn't have voted for Colin Powell if he would have ran. I am about the issues and the first thing that I check out is if the person is **** or ****. Then I look for what are their plans for the youth and the elderly.

Report

Quote

ecepeda from Hialeah, FL · Oct 2007

#272 Reply

****, ****. Whether a person is for **** or not doesn't mean the individual will have the same choice! You never know why a person is ****! If you are **** that's fine, but that has nothing to do with how Hillary will perform as a President. I don't agree with females getting it without parent consent either but at least the choice is available. Or would it be better if the girl has the child and ends up not doing anything with herself because she has to work and raise a child...possibly on her own?

Report

Quote

Sister Tamara from Davenport, IA · Oct 2007

#273 Reply

ecepeda wrote:
****, ****. Whether a person is for **** or not doesn't mean the individual will have the same choice! You never know why a person is ****! If you are **** that's fine, but that has nothing to do with how Hillary will perform as a President. I don't agree with females getting it without parent consent either but at least the choice is available. Or would it be better if the girl has the child and ends up not doing anything with herself because she has to work and raise a child...possibly on her own?

PRAISE THE LORD!!! Is that a real question!?! The young lady doesn't need that choice!!! If she is worried about having a child and not doing anything with herself because she has to work and raise a child, well to me that would be enough not to lay down and spread her legs. The only way to stop unwanted pregnancies and unwanted babies is not to put yourself in that position. That would not be teaching females to respect themselves until they are married, that would teach them well, if you mess up, there's always an easy fix. When do these females get to take responcibity for their own actions??? If you don't want the responcibility of taking care of a baby, than you shouldn't do what it takes to make a baby. Folks want to lay down like their grown, but don't want grown responcibilites, WHAT TYPE OF MESS IS THAT!!! As far as Hillary, that is just one of the issues that I don't agree with her about!!!